Search this Topic:
Jun 20 11 10:02 AM
Jun 29 11 6:52 AM
By Jerome R. Corsi© 2011 WND
Jun 29 11 8:28 AM
Jun 30 11 6:09 PM
so, i guess i still can't move to the bigger picture...1898... not 1878... your failure to examine the facts dooms you to irrelevancy...
Jul 1 11 8:19 AM
Jul 1 11 6:16 PM
all you have done is state your opinion about what are requirements to be cic... just "what i think" by marcel...no matter how much i ask, you provide no codes or statutes...and so, i rely on both the constitution (which clearly states the three requirements) and the defining supreme court case on "citizenship", the dissent to which states that the decision means that wong kim ark is qualified to be president...it is you who are in denial... it's part of your pathology...
Jul 5 11 7:35 AM
The Constitution states: "No Person except a natural-born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."
Since the term "natural-born citizen" is not defined in the Constitution, "Where's the Birth Certificate: The case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President" author Jerome Corsi drew from the writings of Swiss diplomat Emerich de Vattel, whose work is known to have influenced the Founding Fathers. Vattel wrote in "The Law of Nations" in 1758, "The citizens are the members of the civil society, bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority; they equally participate in its advantages. The natives or natural-born citizens are those born in the country of parents who are citizens."
Corsi said that during research for his book he found the only U.S. Supreme Court case directly on point is Minor v. Happersett, from 1874, in which the court said, "It was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners."
Even Senate Resolution 511, passed in 2008 to declare that John McCain was a natural-born citizen, specified a natural-born citizen would have to be born of two U.S. parents. McCain's birth in the Panama Canal Zone was regarded by the Senate as an exception that the Founders would have supported. The Senate reasoned that a person should not be disqualified from running for president because the parents were serving in the defense of the nation, Corsi said.
Among the sponsors of that statement was a junior senator named Obama.
The resolution includes two references to "Americans" or "American Citizens" as parents.
WASHINGTON – The issue of Barack Obama's eligibility to be president took center stage at the National Press Club today, with even portions of the "establishment media" taking note of the heating dispute. Holding a news conference regarding a new lawsuit against Esquire magazine over its faked "report" that falsely claimed a New York Times best-selling book, "Where's the Birth Certificate? The Case That Barack Obama Is Not Eligible To Be President," had been pulled from shelves and recalled were its publisher, WND CEO and founder Joseph Farah, and book author Jerome Corsi, Ph.D. The first part of the news conference: See Part 2 of the news conference here. See Part 3 of the news conference here. See Part 4 of the news conference here. See Part 5 of the news conference here.
Jul 6 11 6:21 AM
Jul 18 11 7:08 AM
Jul 21 11 6:14 PM
Since the term "natural-born citizen" is not defined in the Constitution, "Where's the Birth Certificate: The case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President" author Jerome Corsi drew from the writings of Swiss diplomat Emerich de Vattel, whose work is known to have influenced the Founding Fathers. Vattel wrote in "The Law of Nations" in 1758, "The citizens are the members of the civil society, bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority; they equally participate in its advantages. The natives or natural-born citizens are those born in the country of parents who are citizens.more mumbo jumbo... corsi does what marcel does... he comes to his conclusion, then goes looking for facts that support it... i look for the facts and let them lead me to a conclusion...so i read up on the wong kim ark case... when i saw that 2 of the justices (including the chief justice) disagreed with the justices who outvoted them, and not just "disagreed", but disagreed so vehemently that they put in writing and signed and published it, a dissent which said specifically that (in THEIR opinion - two justices who took marcel's position) the grievous result of this decision was that court had in effect just set a precedent that would allow wong kim ark himself (and anyone who paralleled his circumstances) to be eligible for the presidency...this was a man with two parents, neither of whom were or even COULD be citizens, who, in the opinion of two justices, was eligible to be president solely by the act of being born on united states soil...and one of the reasons that the six prevailing justices CAME to this conclusion had to DO with the "grandfather clause" to which marcel refers... and that clause does NOT refer to "parent's citizenship"... it COULD have... the founders could have said:
"No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, one or both of whose parents themselves were not citizens, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.they COULD have done that - but they didn't... instead, they did this:
No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.so, you see, they discuss "residency" within the united states, but they say NOTHING about parents' citizenship...you and corsi can parade all the vattels you want in front of me, but i'm going with the supreme court, both the majority AND the dissenters... but it's a free country and if you want to take "corsi/vattel" in a texas steel cage tag team death match against the team of "1898 supreme court majority/1898 supreme court minority", that's your business... just don't put any money on corsi/vattel... oh, i forgot... you NEVER back up your bluster with ducats...
Jul 22 11 7:13 PM
Jul 27 11 8:23 AM
Jul 27 11 5:07 PM
as we know, it's very hard to prove a negative...so, the challenge is:prove that obama was NOT born in hawaiiprove that the birth certificate IS a forgeryandprove that the wong kim ark case did NOT establish (through the decision, but MOSTLY through the dissent) that wong kim ark or someone like him would be qualified to run for president... it's VERY hard to prove that negative when the two dissenting justices SAID (in writing) in their dissent, while lamenting the decision, that the decision set a bad precedent - that henceforth, someone born on u.s. soil of two non-citizen parents was qualified to run for president, whereas someone born on foreign soil OF two citizen parents was not (this they lamented, in writing, in a dissent to a supreme court decision)... it's hard to prove a negative when you've got that in front of you... it would be like saying, "corporations aren't PEOPLE... THEY don't have the same rights as PEOPLE... how could they possibly?"... then someone produces the supreme court decision (nothing the founding fathers could EVER have anticipated) and you have to say, "oh... yeah... well, i disagree with their decision"... no matter... the decision is what it is...
By Jerome R. Corsi© 2011 WND
Jul 28 11 7:15 PM
Jul 29 11 7:33 AM
The birth certificate please! Subpoena to be delivered
Attorney, doc experts to show up at Hawaii Department of Health with court document
Posted: July 28, 201111:15 pm Eastern
Read more: The birth certificate please! Subpoena to be delivered http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=327373#ixzz1TVE2yxX9
Computer scanning expert Doug Vogt and typesetting expert Paul Irey say they will accompany attorney Orly Taitz when she presents to the Hawaii Department of Health a subpoena that should allow her to examine Barack Obama's original 1961 typewritten birth certificate.
Vogt and Irey both told WND they are making travel plans to join Taitz in Honolulu when she goes to the state agency at 10 a.m. on Monday, Aug. 8, to present the subpoena in person.
"We will plan to hold a press conference late in the day of Aug. 8," Vogt said, "and if the document we see varies from the birth certificate documents the White House released, we plan to file criminal charges in Hawaii immediately."
You are right and I have wondered myself why is this being neglected when the man is doing so much damage to the country even Blacks are jumping the Ship of Audacity.It has been suggested that the Republicans are waiting to introduce the issue when its too late for the Democrats to do anything about it in the 2012 election.However, Taitz now has the subpoena now and after Hawaiian apparatchicks predictably stonewall the inevitable it will ultimately rhave to be produced and as Ive said, no such document exists and as a result the whole house of cards will be collapsing and the blowback to those who allowed this to happen is going to be monstrous. Its going to go right to Nannystate pellosullini who signed the altered application to the states to vet the candidate of the DNC.The media who sent 40 investigators to Alaska to get palins gyno records at all costs is going to look like the hopelessly biased lap dogs they have always been.Actually I have to say I think the Gun Runner coverup is going to remove this president before the b-cert fraud does.But the Kenyan Dictator is toast because if he stays in office and is the candidate the Democratic party is going to be completely wiped out next year. They are going to resemble the Loony party in Monty Python. Prepare for the spectacle of self righteous Democratic party congresspeople feigning outrage at Obamas duplicitousness.
May 17 12 1:47 PM
© 2017 Yuku. All rights reserved.