This all happened because I was 86'd from Abledarts board for asserting that the
Texas soddomy decision would open the door to anything goes "marriage" that wouldnt
exclude any kind of relationship imaginable.
Events and court decisions since that decision have only made my assertion closer to the new reality.
With the recent past couple days watching the pathology go into overdrive
Ive concluded that the dcase for reality is rapidly devolving into a preference for
madness.
The Supreme Court specifically calls something a tax
and the liberals are all over TV denying that. Contorting discussion into
speaking in tongues. I hear liberals with law degrees saying "it doesnt matter what the
Supreme court says or wants to call it it isnt a tax"
At this point the Democratic party is completely and utterly mad.
as in hatter.
Their sentences consist of meaningless glops of words. Words that have
meaning in general but after they get through using them in a sentence,
they actually dont. Thats a symptom of a pathology not a politcal ideology.
Listen to Nannystate Pelloosullini. Who has set new boundries for how wacky one can be and be reelected.
On this board, all those who cant deal with real argument, who got steamrollered by facts,
who got pancaked by fact backed argument, have chosen to flee.
And it is significant that as the entire Obama fraud, which lead to a botched attempt to frame
gun ownership, has led us to the very same place that the Watergate Committee said was
grounds for impeachment. Only to see that called "racist", only to see the "justice departyment" refuse to prosecute,
means that we are no longer in a world in which reality is seen as being forced to prevail.
The post SCOTUS behavior by the liberals means we are no longer a government of laws because
unless everyone, and I mean everyone, bases what they do and think on the law then its like playing a
game where only you follow the rules while the other side shakes the games two dice, and when a 1 and 2
come up they move 12.
So whats the point of playing that kind of game.
As such things like this discussion list are meaningless because the liberal has proven that they cant
stand truth if it doesnt agree with their view. If you cant use truth as your argument, then whats the point.
I have concluded that regardless of the validity of my points or the degree to which I substantiated my points,
I will never want to be in a place in which i cause anyone to wish i wasnt there.
This is a sign of the times. Reason is obsolete because it cant deal with the things that are happening.
The old adage is "whom gods destroy they first make mad". Whats going on now is madness.
Liberalism has run out of ideas. Things it used to get away with asserting such as the need to uphold the Constitution
have been revealed to have been only something they would do to get rid of their ideological rivals, not a principled position.
I want to sincerely thank the moderator
for allowing a free thinker to express his views.
Which he probably disagreed with vehemently.
So I want to thank him for allowing me to conduct my great experiment.
To see if liberals had any real arguments or if a liberal could actually conduct an argument
or if all they were were people who only had empty catchphrases and heads filled with baseless bromides posing as their arguments.
Obviously when they finally faced someone who could actually argue and do so tirelessly,
someone who didnt just rant because all they had were like-constructed "right-wing" arguments
They had to surrender.
Which is where we are now.
And why Im giving them their discussion list back.
They had their chance to win debates with legitimate argument.
To defeat conservative ideas with liberal ones.
So Westside Progressive can come back.
I wont be here to argue back, post facts and reveal him to be a yapping echo of liberal clap trap.
He can once again be a purveror of brilliant insight.
And I also want to extend my sincere gratitude to the one liberal who held out longer than all the rest.
Wish You Were Dead.
It was alot of fun and he was the most formidable arguer, by far, here, for the lefts positions
His stories about the past are and were pricelss
Too bad ultimately he had no bullets either.
And it appears he knew it.
How can you defend what the Democratic party is doing now.
If a person is good in their heart as I have no doubt WishYWD is, you only have two choices.
Change or avert ones eyes and remain the same.
There are many many people in our culture like WishYWD.
All their cover blown as they are forced to defend the indefensible and they know what they
are defending is indefensible because as i demonstrated with Hillary's Article of impeachment
against Nixon, that they now cant bring themselves to admit exists or ever existed.
So the one reaction that makes sense is to pretend what you think is not necessary to defend.
That is how the pathology, works.
that is what liberalism has become.
As someone who is immunized to the pathology, by my absolute committment to whatever the
outcome of weighing facts and applying reason even if it forces me to change my view, ie the
deifinition of an "open mind", I realize when i am in the only person in the room uninflicted.
I didnt do this experiment to defeat liberals in debate.
I did it to research what liberalism does to good minds.
As such the experiment is concluded.
Now I know.
I will not be returning to even defend what Ive just said.
So those liberals who didnt have the intellectual ammunition to debate may now return and mouth off that they really did.
They may now tell everyone how lucky i was that they didnt put me in my place.
and all those other things bullies say after the guy who could beat the snot out of them goes away.
for going away i am.
Au revoir
beep beep
My deepest respect and thanks to Antfaber who kept his word.
marcel.
Texas soddomy decision would open the door to anything goes "marriage" that wouldnt
exclude any kind of relationship imaginable.
Events and court decisions since that decision have only made my assertion closer to the new reality.
| California bill would let children have more than two parents |
| Sacramento Bee, by Jim Sanders Original Article |
| Beaver had June and Ward. Ricky had Ozzie and Harriet. Mom and Dad, same-sex couples or blended families, California law is clear: No more than two legal parents per child. When adults fight over parenthood, a judge must decide which two have that right and responsibility – but that could end soon. State Sen. Mark Leno is pushing legislation to allow a child to have multiple parents. "The bill brings California into the 21st century, recognizing that there are more than Ozzie and Harriet families today," the San Francisco Democrat said. |
With the recent past couple days watching the pathology go into overdrive
Ive concluded that the dcase for reality is rapidly devolving into a preference for
madness.
The Supreme Court specifically calls something a tax
and the liberals are all over TV denying that. Contorting discussion into
speaking in tongues. I hear liberals with law degrees saying "it doesnt matter what the
Supreme court says or wants to call it it isnt a tax"
At this point the Democratic party is completely and utterly mad.
as in hatter.
Their sentences consist of meaningless glops of words. Words that have
meaning in general but after they get through using them in a sentence,
they actually dont. Thats a symptom of a pathology not a politcal ideology.
Listen to Nannystate Pelloosullini. Who has set new boundries for how wacky one can be and be reelected.
On this board, all those who cant deal with real argument, who got steamrollered by facts,
who got pancaked by fact backed argument, have chosen to flee.
And it is significant that as the entire Obama fraud, which lead to a botched attempt to frame
gun ownership, has led us to the very same place that the Watergate Committee said was
grounds for impeachment. Only to see that called "racist", only to see the "justice departyment" refuse to prosecute,
means that we are no longer in a world in which reality is seen as being forced to prevail.
The post SCOTUS behavior by the liberals means we are no longer a government of laws because
unless everyone, and I mean everyone, bases what they do and think on the law then its like playing a
game where only you follow the rules while the other side shakes the games two dice, and when a 1 and 2
come up they move 12.
So whats the point of playing that kind of game.
As such things like this discussion list are meaningless because the liberal has proven that they cant
stand truth if it doesnt agree with their view. If you cant use truth as your argument, then whats the point.
I have concluded that regardless of the validity of my points or the degree to which I substantiated my points,
I will never want to be in a place in which i cause anyone to wish i wasnt there.
This is a sign of the times. Reason is obsolete because it cant deal with the things that are happening.
The old adage is "whom gods destroy they first make mad". Whats going on now is madness.
Liberalism has run out of ideas. Things it used to get away with asserting such as the need to uphold the Constitution
have been revealed to have been only something they would do to get rid of their ideological rivals, not a principled position.
I want to sincerely thank the moderator
for allowing a free thinker to express his views.
Which he probably disagreed with vehemently.
So I want to thank him for allowing me to conduct my great experiment.
To see if liberals had any real arguments or if a liberal could actually conduct an argument
or if all they were were people who only had empty catchphrases and heads filled with baseless bromides posing as their arguments.
Obviously when they finally faced someone who could actually argue and do so tirelessly,
someone who didnt just rant because all they had were like-constructed "right-wing" arguments
They had to surrender.
Which is where we are now.
And why Im giving them their discussion list back.
They had their chance to win debates with legitimate argument.
To defeat conservative ideas with liberal ones.
So Westside Progressive can come back.
I wont be here to argue back, post facts and reveal him to be a yapping echo of liberal clap trap.
He can once again be a purveror of brilliant insight.
And I also want to extend my sincere gratitude to the one liberal who held out longer than all the rest.
Wish You Were Dead.
It was alot of fun and he was the most formidable arguer, by far, here, for the lefts positions
His stories about the past are and were pricelss
Too bad ultimately he had no bullets either.
And it appears he knew it.
How can you defend what the Democratic party is doing now.
If a person is good in their heart as I have no doubt WishYWD is, you only have two choices.
Change or avert ones eyes and remain the same.
There are many many people in our culture like WishYWD.
All their cover blown as they are forced to defend the indefensible and they know what they
are defending is indefensible because as i demonstrated with Hillary's Article of impeachment
against Nixon, that they now cant bring themselves to admit exists or ever existed.
So the one reaction that makes sense is to pretend what you think is not necessary to defend.
That is how the pathology, works.
that is what liberalism has become.
As someone who is immunized to the pathology, by my absolute committment to whatever the
outcome of weighing facts and applying reason even if it forces me to change my view, ie the
deifinition of an "open mind", I realize when i am in the only person in the room uninflicted.
I didnt do this experiment to defeat liberals in debate.
I did it to research what liberalism does to good minds.
As such the experiment is concluded.
Now I know.
I will not be returning to even defend what Ive just said.
So those liberals who didnt have the intellectual ammunition to debate may now return and mouth off that they really did.
They may now tell everyone how lucky i was that they didnt put me in my place.
and all those other things bullies say after the guy who could beat the snot out of them goes away.
for going away i am.
Au revoir
beep beep
My deepest respect and thanks to Antfaber who kept his word.
marcel.
